Breaking Stereotypes: Why Creative Communication Career Deserve Respect by Shrida Trivedi

June 20, 2025

Case Study: Paper Boat’s #FloatABoat – A Masterclass in Emotional Branding

June 24, 2025

Published by SCoRe at June 23, 2025

When Reputation Collapses: What United Airlines Taught the World

Reputation management plays a crucial role in how brands survive public scrutiny, especially in the age of social media. On 9 April 2017, United Airlines faced an unprecedented blow to its corporate reputation. A video showing a passenger, Dr David Dao, being violently dragged off Flight 3411 went viral. This horrifying scene, recorded by other passengers on their smartphones, painted the airline as aggressive and indifferent.

Although overbooking is standard industry practice, the way this case unfolded was anything but normal. The visuals were graphic, the response was cold, and public anger was swift. United Airlines’ initial reaction prioritised procedure over empathy, further damaging its brand image.

This event became a cautionary tale in modern reputation management, showing how one mishandled incident can spiral into a full-blown global crisis.

What Triggered the United Airlines Reputation Management Disaster?

The crisis began when United Airlines overbooked Flight 3411 from Chicago to Louisville. After all seats were taken, the airline asked for volunteers to give up their seats for commuting staff. Dr Dao refused. In response, airport security forcibly removed him, injuring him in the process.

Passengers recorded the entire scene. Videos showed a bloodied and screaming Dr Dao being dragged down the aisle. Within hours, these videos flooded social media, sparking global outrage.

Although overbooking was common, the physical nature of the removal shocked people. Hence, the incident became less about airline policy and more about brand ethics and public accountability.

How Did the Brand Image Erode So Rapidly?

In any reputation management scenario, timing is everything. United Airlines failed to respond swiftly and compassionately. Its initial press release described the situation as an “overbook situation” and labelled the passenger as “disruptive.” This language lacked emotional intelligence and failed to acknowledge the public’s growing anger.

Moreover, an internal email from CEO Oscar Munoz, which defended staff actions, was leaked. It contradicted the public statement issued later and made the company appear disingenuous.

Therefore, instead of calming the storm, the misaligned messaging inflamed it. The brand quickly became synonymous with customer mistreatment and corporate arrogance.

Why Was United’s Reputation Management Response Ineffective?

The company’s reputation management strategy failed on several fronts:

Defensive language: Using terms like “re-accommodate” felt dismissive.
Lack of empathy: The initial response focused on procedures, not the injured passenger.
Mixed messaging: Internal and external communications clashed.

Only after days of pressure did the CEO issue a sincere public apology, calling the incident “truly horrific.” He then promised a full review and policy reform.

However, by this point, the public had already formed its opinion. The delay in acknowledging the human cost of the incident severely undermined efforts to repair the airline’s brand trust.

What Was the Company’s Public Message and Its Impact on Brand Trust?

United initially aimed to justify its actions. The first message prioritised company policy and minimised the customer’s experience. The result? Outrage.

Later, after backlash from politicians, media, and the general public, the airline pivoted. The revised message accepted full responsibility and promised change.

This shift in tone was necessary but too late. It highlighted a crucial lesson in reputation management—once public perception is set, it is extremely difficult to reverse.

Brands must act quickly and speak clearly during crises. More importantly, they must show they care.

Which Channels Failed During the Crisis Communication?

Several communication channels contributed to United’s brand image disaster:

Corporate Statements

The first release lacked clarity and compassion. The revised version was stronger, but its delay weakened impact.

CEO Messaging

Oscar Munoz’s conflicting statements created confusion. The internal email seemed to contradict the later public apology.

Social Media Handling

Hashtags like #BoycottUnited dominated Twitter and Facebook. United was slow to respond online. This gave users free rein to shape the story without any counter-narrative.

Media Interviews

The CEO eventually appeared on national TV, expressing regret. While this was a step in the right direction, it came too late to change public opinion.

How Did the Public and Financial Fallout Affect Corporate Reputation?

The fallout from the incident and its mishandling was immediate and severe:

Viral Videos: Millions saw the footage within hours. The damage was visual, emotional, and unforgettable.
Stock Price: United’s share price dropped nearly 4% in one day, wiping out around $1 billion in market value.
Brand Sentiment: Surveys reported a sharp decline in trust, particularly among millennials and frequent flyers.
Legal Pressure: Dr Dao settled with United for an undisclosed amount. U.S. lawmakers began probing airline practices.

Therefore, the crisis did not only tarnish United’s public image. It also weakened its corporate reputation in the eyes of regulators, customers, and shareholders alike.

What Lessons Can You Learn in Reputation Management from This Case?

For students pursuing careers in communications, this case offers rich insights:

Empathy Over Policy: Speak to people’s emotions before quoting the rulebook.
Speed Matters: React quickly to control the narrative.
Consistency Is Crucial: Align internal emails with public messaging.
Visuals Raise the Stakes: In the smartphone age, nothing is private.
Action Beats Apology: Real change must follow public statements.

As Richard Levick, a crisis management expert, rightly said:

“This was not just a communications failure. It was a failure of empathy, judgement, and organisational preparedness.”

In short, reputation management is about how quickly and truthfully a brand can respond when things go wrong.

What Were the Long-Term Risks to United’s Brand Image?

The aftermath of the crisis presented multiple long-term challenges:

Customer Loyalty Loss: Many passengers vowed never to fly with United again.
Negative Brand Association: “United” became linked with mistreatment and poor service.
Increased Scrutiny: The airline industry as a whole came under tighter regulatory observation.
Online Mockery: Memes and satirical videos extended the crisis’s lifespan.

Therefore, companies must view every public interaction as a reflection of their core values. A single incident, if mishandled, can undo years of reputation building.

Why Is This a Benchmark in Reputation Management Case Studies?

This incident marked a turning point in how brands approach crisis communication. It taught us that:

Real-time video evidence makes denial impossible.
Corporate tone must match public sentiment.
Delay and deflection deepen reputational wounds.

It is now used globally in classrooms and training workshops to illustrate best—and worst—practices in reputation management.

Want to Know the Best Institute for Reputation Management Training in India?

Ready to master crisis communication and brand protection?
Explore PGDM in Public Relations and Corporate Communications at SCoRe – designed for future leaders in communications and media. Learn from real-world case studies like this one and sharpen your strategic thinking. Visit us today at scoreindia.org or give a call at +91 98115 72673 to know about the course in Public Relations.

United Airlines Flight 3411 Crisis: A Reputation Management Failure in the Digital Age